Table of Contents

What is myInterview?

Key Features of myInterview Platform

Video Interviewing Capabilities

Collaboration Tools

Candidate Experience

Technical Infrastructure

myInterview Pricing

myInterview Reviews: What Users Are Saying

Positive Feedback

Negative Feedback

Rating Overview

myInterview Pros and Cons

Pros

Cons

Top 5 Alternatives to myInterview

Hirevire

Company Overview and Value Proposition

Comprehensive Feature Analysis

Pricing Advantages

Superior User Experience

Exceptional Ratings and User Testimonials

Why Hirevire Outperforms myInterview

RecRight 

Key Features

Pricing

Strengths

Limitations:

Harver (Previously Outmatch)

Key Features

Pricing and Value Comparison

Strengths and Limitations

User Ratings and Testimonials

Best For

Spark Hire

Key Features

Pricing and Value Comparison

Strengths and Limitations

User Ratings and Testimonials

Best For

VidCruiter

Key Features

Pricing and Value Comparison

Strengths and Limitations

User Ratings and Testimonials

Best For

Comprehensive Comparison Table

How to Choose the Right Alternative to myInterview

Assess Your Primary Pain Points

Consider Your Organization's Scale

Making the Switch: Migration Strategies

Evaluate Your Current Process

Implement With Focus

Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions: FAQs

What is myInterview and how does it work?

How much does myInterview cost compared to alternatives?

What are common complaints about myInterview?

Is myInterview suitable for small businesses?

While myInterview's free tier serves basic needs, growing businesses often encounter limitations as hiring scales. Hirevire provides more sustainable value for expanding organizations with its unlimited model and broader assessment capabilities.

Does myInterview integrate with popular ATS systems?

Get Started With Hirevire Today

In today's competitive job market, video interviewing has become an essential tool for organizations seeking to streamline their recruitment process. Among the platforms available, myInterview has established itself as a notable option for companies looking to implement video-based candidate screening.

But is myInterview truly the best solution for your organization's unique hiring needs? As remote and hybrid work models continue to reshape the recruitment landscape, selecting the right video interviewing platform can significantly impact your ability to attract, assess, and secure top talent efficiently.

This comprehensive review examines myInterview's features, pricing structure, user experiences, and limitations to help you make an informed decision. We'll also explore five leading alternatives—with special attention to Hirevire, a platform that addresses many of myInterview's limitations while offering additional capabilities at a competitive price point.

By the end of this article, you'll have a clear understanding of whether myInterview aligns with your recruitment goals or if another solution might better serve your organization's hiring needs. Let's dive into what myInterview offers, what its users are saying, and how it compares to other leading video interviewing platforms in the market.

What is myInterview?

myInterview is a video-based candidate assessment platform designed to help organizations streamline their recruitment processes through asynchronous video interviews. Founded in 2016 by Benjamin Gillman and Guy Abelsohn, the platform has grown to serve businesses of all sizes across various industries, with a particular focus on providing an intuitive and accessible interviewing experience.

At its core, myInterview enables recruiters to create customized video interview questions that candidates can answer on their own time. This asynchronous approach eliminates scheduling conflicts and allows hiring teams to review responses at their convenience, significantly reducing the time spent on initial screening calls while still maintaining a personal connection with candidates.

The platform primarily targets small to mid-sized businesses, recruitment agencies, and enterprises seeking an efficient way to screen candidates before investing in live interviews. Its user-friendly interface is designed to be accessible for organizations without specialized technical expertise, making it particularly appealing for teams where hiring is important but not the primary focus.

According to the company's data, myInterview has processed over 3 million interviews since its inception, helping organizations across various sectors improve their candidate evaluation processes. The platform emphasizes creating a positive candidate experience through a branded, user-friendly interface that puts applicants at ease during the video interview process.

myInterview has continued to evolve its service offerings, introducing AI-powered candidate evaluation tools and expanding its integration capabilities with popular applicant tracking systems (ATS). The platform supports multiple languages and provides a customizable experience for both recruiters and candidates, reflecting its focus on accessibility across different markets and hiring contexts.

Key Features of myInterview Platform

myInterview offers a range of features designed to support the video interviewing process across different organizational contexts. Let's examine the platform's core capabilities across four key functional areas:

Video Interviewing Capabilities

myInterview's primary offering centers on its video interviewing functionality, which includes:

One-way video interviews: Recruiters can create customized interview questions that candidates answer on their own time through video recordings. This asynchronous approach eliminates scheduling constraints while allowing hiring teams to evaluate candidates based on both verbal and non-verbal communication.

Branded candidate experience: Organizations can customize the interview interface with their logo, colors, and messaging to create a cohesive employer brand experience. This branding capability helps reinforce company identity throughout the recruitment process.

Question customization options: The platform offers both pre-built question templates and the ability to create custom questions specific to each role. Recruiters can set time limits for responses and provide additional context or instructions for candidates.

Interview recording and playback: All candidate responses are recorded and stored securely within the platform, allowing hiring teams to review, compare, and share interviews throughout the decision-making process. The playback functionality includes options for rating responses and adding notes.

Collaboration Tools

To facilitate team-based hiring decisions, myInterview includes several collaboration features:

Team review capabilities: Multiple stakeholders can access and review candidate responses, enabling collaborative evaluation across different departments or team members.

Candidate shortlisting: The platform provides tools to categorize candidates into different stages of consideration, helping recruiters organize and prioritize applicants based on their video responses and qualifications.

Sharing and evaluation features: Interviews can be easily shared with relevant decision-makers through secure links, even if they don't have direct access to the myInterview platform. This flexibility helps include key stakeholders in the hiring process.

Stakeholder collaboration options: Rating systems and comment features allow team members to provide structured feedback on candidates, creating a consolidated view of different perspectives on each applicant.

These collaboration tools aim to streamline the decision-making process across hiring teams, though some users report limitations in the depth of these features compared to more comprehensive recruitment platforms.

Candidate Experience

myInterview places significant emphasis on creating a positive experience for candidates, which includes:

User interface and accessibility: The platform offers a relatively straightforward interview process for candidates, with clear instructions and minimal technical requirements. The interface is designed to be approachable for candidates with varying levels of technical proficiency.

Mobile compatibility: Candidates can complete interviews on mobile devices through dedicated iOS and Android apps, providing flexibility for applicants to respond from their preferred device.

Candidate comfort features: Features like practice questions and unlimited retakes (configurable by the employer) help reduce candidate anxiety and allow applicants to present their best selves through the video format.

Completion rates and user feedback: The platform's emphasis on user-friendly design aims to maximize completion rates, with the company reporting high candidate satisfaction scores based on post-interview feedback.

While myInterview's candidate experience is generally well-regarded, some reviewers note that the requirement for candidates to download mobile apps or create accounts can create friction in the application process compared to browser-based alternatives.

Technical Infrastructure

Supporting myInterview's functional capabilities is its technical architecture:

Platform security and compliance: The platform implements standard security measures to protect candidate data and interview content, though specific compliance certifications are not prominently featured in their marketing materials.

Integration capabilities with ATS: myInterview connects with popular applicant tracking systems including Greenhouse, Workable, JobAdder, and others through native integrations. The platform also offers Zapier connectivity for additional integration options.

Multilingual support: The platform supports multiple languages including English, Hebrew, Spanish, French, German, Chinese, Korean, and Portuguese, making it suitable for organizations with international hiring needs.

Analytics and dashboard features: Basic analytics and reporting tools provide insights into candidate completion rates and interview performance, though the depth of these analytics may be limited compared to enterprise-focused alternatives.

While myInterview's technical foundation supports its core functionality, some users report limitations in advanced features and integration depth that may impact organizations with complex recruitment technology stacks.

myInterview Pricing

Understanding myInterview's pricing structure is essential for evaluating its value proposition compared to alternatives in the video interviewing market. The platform offers a tiered pricing approach that includes both free and paid options:

Free Tier: myInterview offers a basic free plan that includes limited functionality, providing a no-cost entry point for small businesses or organizations with occasional hiring needs. The free tier typically includes restrictions on the number of interviews, customization options, and collaboration features.

Paid Plans: For organizations requiring more robust capabilities, myInterview offers premium tiers with expanded features. While specific pricing is not prominently published on their website (requiring contact with sales), industry sources indicate that paid plans start around $39/month when billed annually.

Enterprise Options: Larger organizations with substantial hiring volumes can access custom enterprise pricing with additional features, support options, and volume-based considerations. These plans typically require direct negotiation with the myInterview sales team.

When compared to industry averages for video interviewing platforms, myInterview positions itself in the mid-range category. The platform is more affordable than enterprise-focused solutions but may have higher costs than some basic video recording tools.

The value proposition centers on simplicity and ease of implementation, with myInterview emphasizing fast setup and intuitive user experience rather than extensive technical capabilities. According to user reviews, the platform delivers good value for organizations seeking straightforward video interviewing without complex requirements.

Potential customers should be aware of several considerations that may affect the total cost of ownership:

Annual Commitment: Some reviewers mention that myInterview has shifted toward annual subscription models, potentially limiting flexibility for organizations with seasonal or sporadic hiring needs.

Feature Limitations: The free tier includes significant restrictions that may necessitate upgrading to paid plans for practical implementation in many business contexts.

Integration Costs: While basic integrations are included, more complex connectivity with existing HR systems may require additional investment or premium plan levels.

Scaling Considerations: Organizations with growing hiring needs should evaluate how the pricing structure scales with increased usage to avoid unexpected cost increases.

myInterview does provide a free trial period for its paid tiers, allowing organizations to evaluate the platform before committing. However, the transition from free to paid plans and the specific limitations of each tier may require careful consideration for organizations with budget constraints or variable hiring volumes.

myInterview Reviews: What Users Are Saying

User feedback provides valuable insights into the real-world performance of myInterview. Analyzing reviews across major platforms like G2, Capterra, and other software review sites reveals consistent patterns in both positive and negative user experiences.

Positive Feedback

Ease of use and implementation: Many users praise myInterview's straightforward setup process and intuitive interface. One Capterra reviewer noted: "myInterview's very easy to use, it's priced competitively, and it integrates deeply with our ATS. The team is really great to work with too."

Candidate experience quality: Organizations consistently highlight the positive experience for applicants. A G2 reviewer shared: "It's making the early stages of screening much easier by giving us a chance to get to know candidates better. They can complete the interviews at a time that's convenient to them."

Time and cost savings benefits: Users frequently mention efficiency improvements in their screening process. One reviewer stated: "I'm able to review interviews at my convenience, any time. The candidates are also able to complete video interviews whenever they are ready for it, which can significantly reduce the amount of stress."

Integration capabilities: Several reviewers appreciate the platform's ability to connect with popular ATS systems. A Capterra user mentioned that "it integrates deeply with our ATS," though others note limitations with more specialized HR systems.

These positive experiences align with myInterview's core value proposition of providing a straightforward, user-friendly video interviewing solution for organizations seeking to streamline their initial candidate screening.

Negative Feedback

Limited features in free tier: A common theme in critical feedback centers on the restrictions of the free version. One reviewer noted: "It's also annoying that upon canceling the premium subscription, you don't get reverted back to the free tier, but everything just kinda stops."

Integration challenges with some systems: Organizations with specialized HR systems report occasional difficulties. A Capterra user mentioned: "Custom integration does not fully integrate with self-service option; so there is some linkage point missing."

Pricing concerns for certain use cases: Some users mention cost considerations, particularly the shift toward annual commitment requirements. One reviewer stated: "I would appreciate if myInterview brought back the monthly subscription plan. For organizations or consultants who hire infrequently throughout the year, a monthly option offers greater flexibility."

Feature limitations compared to alternatives: Multiple reviews cite limitations in functionality compared to more comprehensive platforms. One user noted: "So far, I didn't find much that I don't like about it. Maybe more questions available (not just 10) would be good thing to have for some roles."

These limitations suggest that while myInterview works well for straightforward video interviewing needs, organizations requiring more advanced features or specialized capabilities may encounter constraints.

Rating Overview

Across major review platforms, myInterview maintains relatively strong ratings:

G2: Approximately 4.7/5 stars based on 90+ reviews 

Capterra: Around 4.7/5 stars from 40+ reviews

The sentiment analysis suggests that myInterview performs well for its core functionality of basic video interviewing, with most criticisms centered around specific limitations rather than fundamental platform issues. The relatively positive ratings reflect the platform's success in delivering on its core promise of simplified video screening, though organizations with more complex needs may find its capabilities insufficient.

myInterview Pros and Cons

After examining myInterview's features and user experiences, we can identify clear strengths and limitations that organizations should consider when evaluating the platform.

Pros

Simple setup and user-friendly interface: myInterview excels in providing an intuitive experience that requires minimal technical expertise. Organizations can implement the platform quickly, often within hours, without extensive training or IT support. This accessibility makes it particularly valuable for teams where hiring is important but not the primary focus.

Branded candidate experience: The platform's customization options allow organizations to create a cohesive employer brand presence throughout the interview process. This branding capability helps reinforce company identity and create a professional impression for candidates during their application journey.

Integration with popular ATS systems: myInterview offers connectivity with mainstream applicant tracking systems like Greenhouse, Workable, and JobAdder, helping streamline recruitment workflows for organizations using these platforms. While integration depth varies, the basic connectivity helps maintain consistent candidate records across systems.

Free tier availability: The platform's free option provides an accessible entry point for small businesses or organizations with occasional hiring needs. This no-cost tier allows companies to explore video interviewing without initial investment, though with feature limitations.

Quick implementation: myInterview's focus on simplicity enables rapid deployment, with many organizations able to create and distribute their first video interviews within hours of signing up. This speed-to-value is particularly valuable for urgent hiring needs or teams without dedicated recruitment resources.

These strengths make myInterview a viable option for organizations seeking a straightforward video interviewing solution without complex technical requirements or extensive training needs.

Cons

Limited response format options: Unlike some competitors, myInterview focuses primarily on video responses, lacking options for audio-only, text, or file-based submissions. This video-only approach may not accommodate all candidate preferences or role-specific assessment needs.

Potential candidate login requirements: Some versions of the platform require candidates to create accounts or download mobile apps, which can create friction in the application process. This additional step may lead to lower completion rates compared to browser-based alternatives with no login requirements.

Pricing structure for growing companies: The transition from free to paid tiers may present challenges for scaling organizations, particularly with the reported shift toward annual commitments. Organizations with variable hiring volumes or seasonal needs may find the pricing model less flexible than desired.

Feature limitations compared to alternatives: Organizations requiring advanced assessment capabilities, AI-powered evaluation, or comprehensive integration options may find myInterview's functionality limited relative to more robust platforms. The platform prioritizes simplicity over extensive features, which may be insufficient for complex recruitment needs.

Integration depth concerns: While myInterview connects with popular ATS systems, the depth and flexibility of these integrations may be limited compared to platforms with more extensive connectivity options. Organizations with specialized HR systems or complex technology ecosystems may encounter integration challenges.

These limitations highlight that myInterview may not be the optimal solution for all organization types, particularly those with advanced technical requirements, complex assessment needs, or expectations for seamless integration across diverse HR systems.

Top 5 Alternatives to myInterview

While myInterview offers a straightforward video interviewing solution, several alternatives provide compelling features and value propositions that may better align with specific organizational needs. Let's examine five leading competitors, with special focus on Hirevire as the premier alternative.

Hirevire

Hirevire has emerged as the leading alternative to myInterview, offering a comprehensive candidate screening platform that addresses many of myInterview's limitations while providing enhanced capabilities at a competitive price point.

Company Overview and Value Proposition

Hirevire has transformed the recruitment process with its automated screening platform that enables asynchronous video, audio, and file-based candidate interviews. Unlike myInterview's focus primarily on video responses, Hirevire provides a versatile solution that works across all response formats while maintaining an exceptional focus on user experience for both recruiters and candidates.

The platform is designed to eliminate time-consuming screening calls while maintaining high-quality candidate assessment. This approach particularly benefits organizations where hiring is not the only focus, allowing recruitment to proceed efficiently without consuming excessive resources or requiring context-switching between hiring and other responsibilities.

Hirevire's core value proposition centers on three primary benefits: dramatic time savings in the screening process, improved candidate assessment quality, and enhanced team collaboration. The platform has been recognized for "Best Ease of Use 2025" by Capterra and is trusted by over 500 companies globally.

Comprehensive Feature Analysis

Hirevire's multi-format response collection capabilities set it apart from myInterview's video-focused approach:

Video responses: Like myInterview, Hirevire enables video-based assessments for evaluating communication skills, cultural fit, and presentation abilities. However, Hirevire's implementation requires no downloads or logins, creating a frictionless candidate experience.

Audio recordings: Unique to Hirevire among the alternatives, the platform offers dedicated audio response options that are ideal for roles where verbal communication is paramount but visual elements are less critical.

File uploads: Hirevire enables candidates to submit portfolios, code samples, or other work products directly through the platform, providing recruiters with tangible evidence of capabilities beyond interview responses.

Rich text responses: For questions requiring detailed written answers, Hirevire provides a full-featured text editor that allows candidates to thoroughly explain concepts or demonstrate written communication skills.

The platform's AI transcription capabilities support over 90+ languages, making it ideal for global recruitment. These automatic transcriptions enhance accessibility and allow for text-based searching within video content, features not prominently available in myInterview's offering.

Hirevire's unlimited responses model eliminates volume-based restrictions that can constrain recruitment efforts on other platforms. Organizations can invite unlimited candidates without worrying about per-candidate charges or usage limitations, providing predictable costs regardless of hiring volume.

The no-login required approach for candidates significantly reduces friction in the application process. Unlike myInterview and many competitors that require candidate registration, Hirevire allows candidates to respond directly through shared links, improving completion rates and candidate experience.

Integration capabilities through Zapier connect Hirevire with 5000+ apps, vastly expanding its connectivity compared to myInterview's more limited integration options. This extensive integration ecosystem allows organizations to incorporate Hirevire seamlessly into existing recruitment workflows and technology stacks.

Custom branding options enable organizations to create a consistent, professional candidate experience that reinforces employer branding throughout the screening process. Organizations can customize application pages with logos, colors, and intro/outro videos that reflect their unique culture and identity.

Pricing Advantages

Hirevire's transparent pricing structure represents a significant advantage over myInterview's less clear pricing approach. All pricing information is clearly published on the website, allowing organizations to make informed decisions without sales interactions:

One Job plan: $39/month (perfect to start with) - Provides all core features for organizations with occasional hiring needs 

Startup plan: $99/month (for businesses hiring regularly) - Offers enhanced capabilities for growing teams with consistent recruitment requirements 

Growth plan: $199/month (for recruitment agencies) - Delivers advanced features for high-volume recruitment operations

All plans include unlimited responses, eliminating the unpredictable costs associated with per-candidate pricing models. This approach allows organizations to budget confidently regardless of fluctuations in hiring volume.

Compared to myInterview's pricing, which starts around a similar price point but may include various limitations and annual commitment requirements, Hirevire offers a more cost-effective and transparent solution with greater functionality included in the base price.

Superior User Experience

Hirevire's no-login requirement for candidates creates a frictionless experience that improves completion rates and first impressions. Candidates can simply click a link and begin recording responses without creating accounts or navigating complex registration processes.

Cross-device compatibility ensures candidates can complete interviews on any device—desktop, tablet, or smartphone—without downloading specialized applications. This flexibility accommodates candidates' preferences and circumstances, improving accessibility compared to platforms requiring dedicated apps.

Unlimited re-recording options allow candidates to present their best selves, reducing anxiety and improving response quality. Candidates can practice and refine their answers before submitting, resulting in more thoughtful and polished presentations.

The implementation process is remarkably simple, with most organizations able to set up their first video interview within minutes of signing up. This rapid deployment contrasts with the more complex setup process reported by some myInterview users.

Exceptional Ratings and User Testimonials

Hirevire has earned outstanding ratings across major review platforms:

  • G2: 4.7/5 stars (25+ reviews)
  • Capterra: 5/5 stars (20+ reviews)
  • AppSumo: 4.9/5 (70+ reviews)

These consistently high ratings reflect exceptional user satisfaction from both organizations and candidates, surpassing the already positive reviews available for myInterview.

User testimonials highlight the transformative impact Hirevire has had on recruitment processes:

"Hirevire is exactly what I was looking for in a video interview platform. It is easy to use, fast to adopt, and streamlined for the applicants. I use the platform primarily to help vet freelancers and I appreciate how easy it is to add video response questions as well as text response questions to the application form." - Sarah M., Recruitment Manager

"Before Hirevire, I was cobbling together a makeshift solution using Typeform and Loom videos. While it worked, it was time-consuming and lacked the finesse I desired. Hirevire has made this process so much easier. Now, I achieve superior results in half the time." - Michael T., HR Director

"As a career coach and recruiter, I support candidates in all stages of career transition. Adding Hirevire to my toolkit has positioned me to process more candidates while decreasing the time invested in the recruitment lifecycle." - Jennifer K., Recruitment Consultant

These testimonials consistently emphasize Hirevire's ease of use, time savings, and improved candidate experience—directly addressing the pain points identified in myInterview reviews.

Why Hirevire Outperforms myInterview

Hirevire delivers a more comprehensive feature set at a competitive cost, providing greater value for recruitment budgets. While myInterview focuses primarily on video interviewing, Hirevire offers a versatile platform suitable for all response formats and recruitment scenarios.

The candidate experience is significantly enhanced through the no-login requirement, unlimited re-recording options, and cross-device compatibility. These features reduce application friction and improve completion rates compared to myInterview's approach that may require account creation or app downloads.

Hirevire's superior integration capabilities through Zapier connect with 5000+ apps, far exceeding myInterview's more limited integration options. This extensive connectivity allows organizations to incorporate video interviewing seamlessly into existing recruitment workflows.

Multi-format response options provide greater flexibility than myInterview's video-focused approach. Organizations can collect video, audio, text, and file responses based on specific role requirements, creating a more customized assessment experience.

Transparent pricing eliminates the uncertainty associated with myInterview's less clear model. Organizations can make informed decisions without sales interactions and budget confidently with the unlimited responses model, unlike myInterview's potential volume-based limitations.

For organizations seeking a modern, flexible candidate screening solution that addresses the limitations of traditional video interviewing platforms like myInterview, Hirevire represents the definitive choice in the market.

RecRight 


RecRight positions itself as a collaborative video interviewing platform designed to streamline team-based hiring decisions. With its focus on making recruitment more efficient through shared evaluation tools, RecRight serves organizations prioritizing collaborative hiring processes.

The platform emphasizes simplicity and team collaboration, offering one-way video interviews that multiple stakeholders can review and evaluate together. RecRight's no-login requirement for candidates reduces friction in the application process, similar to Hirevire's approach but with more limited functionality.

Key Features

  • Asynchronous video interviews with easy sharing capabilities
  • Team collaboration tools for collective candidate evaluation
  • No login required for candidates to complete interviews
  • Mobile-friendly interface for both recruiters and candidates
  • Basic integration options with popular HR systems

Pricing

Contact sales for customized pricing based on specific requirements. This lack of transparent pricing can complicate budget planning for organizations comparing multiple solutions.

Strengths

  • Strong collaboration features for team-based hiring decisions
  • Simple, intuitive interface requiring minimal training
  • No candidate login reduces application abandonment
  • Solid ratings across review platforms (G2: 4.8/5, Capterra: 4.8/5 from 50+ reviews)

Limitations:

  • Lacks multi-format response options (video-only)
  • No transparent pricing model
  • Limited advanced features compared to comprehensive platforms
  • Missing AI transcription capabilities

While RecRight excels at facilitating team collaboration in video interviewing, organizations requiring more comprehensive assessment options, transparent pricing, or advanced features like AI transcription in multiple languages would benefit from exploring alternatives like Hirevire, which offers greater functionality at a clearly defined price point.


Harver (Previously Outmatch)

Outmatch (recently rebranded in some markets) offers a comprehensive talent assessment platform with video interviewing capabilities as part of a broader assessment suite.

Key Features

  • Video interviewing integrated with pre-hire assessments
  • AI-driven candidate evaluation and scoring
  • Competency-based assessment frameworks
  • Automated reference checking capabilities
  • Extensive analytics and reporting features

The platform takes a holistic approach to candidate evaluation, combining video interviews with assessments and reference checks for a multi-dimensional view of applicant suitability.

Pricing and Value Comparison

Outmatch utilizes custom enterprise pricing that typically exceeds myInterview's cost structure significantly. While specific figures require direct contact with sales, industry sources suggest implementations starting in the thousands annually for mid-sized organizations.

This premium pricing reflects Outmatch's positioning as a comprehensive talent assessment solution rather than a standalone video interviewing tool, making it considerably more expensive than focused platforms like myInterview or Hirevire.

Strengths and Limitations

Strengths:

  • Comprehensive assessment capabilities beyond video
  • Science-backed evaluation methodologies
  • Enterprise-grade reporting and analytics
  • Integration with major ATS platforms

Limitations:

  • Significantly higher price point than alternatives
  • Complex implementation requirements
  • Potentially overwhelming for organizations with basic needs
  • Less agile than specialized video interviewing platforms

User Ratings and Testimonials

Outmatch maintains solid ratings from enterprise users:

"Outmatch provides excellent tools for interviewing candidates with interactive sessions and detailed feedback," shares one enterprise HR Director. However, smaller organizations note that "the platform's enterprise focus and pricing structure makes it less accessible for teams with limited recruitment budgets."

Best For

Outmatch is best suited for large enterprises with substantial recruitment budgets seeking a comprehensive assessment approach rather than standalone video interviewing. Organizations that prioritize scientific assessment methodologies and have the resources for complex implementation may find value in its extensive capabilities.

Spark Hire

Spark Hire has established itself as a prominent video interviewing platform with particular strength in recruitment agency and staffing firm contexts.

Key Features

  • One-way and live video interviewing options
  • Team collaboration tools for agency environments
  • Branded interview experiences for recruitment firms
  • Client presentation tools for candidate showcasing
  • Integrated scheduling and reminder systems

The platform emphasizes collaborative hiring and candidate presentation features, making it popular with staffing firms that need to showcase candidates to client organizations.

Pricing and Value Comparison

Spark Hire's published pricing starts at $299/month for basic functionality, with professional tiers at $499/month. This positions it at a higher price point than both myInterview and Hirevire, though with transparent published rates.

The platform offers similar core video functionality to myInterview but with stronger emphasis on recruitment agency use cases and collaboration features, justifying its premium positioning for those specific contexts.

Strengths and Limitations

Strengths:

  • Strong collaboration features for team hiring
  • Client presentation tools for staffing firms
  • Transparent pricing model with published rates
  • Established market presence with large user base

Limitations:

  • Higher starting price than alternatives
  • Primarily focused on video without multi-format options
  • Less user-friendly for candidates than some competitors
  • Mobile experience less seamless than newer platforms

User Ratings and Testimonials

Spark Hire maintains strong ratings with a substantial review base:

  • G2: 4.7/5 stars (670+ reviews)
  • Capterra: 4.7/5 stars (100+ reviews)

"Spark Hire's client presentation features have transformed how we showcase candidates to hiring managers," notes a Staffing Agency Director. "The ability to share interview recordings directly has improved decision-making speed significantly, though we sometimes find the pricing model restrictive for fluctuating hiring volumes."

Best For

Spark Hire is best suited for recruitment agencies, staffing firms, and mid-sized companies with dedicated recruiting resources and moderate budgets. Organizations seeking video-focused solutions with strong collaboration features may find value in Spark Hire despite its higher price point.

VidCruiter

VidCruiter offers a comprehensive video recruitment solution with particular strength in compliance-focused industries and structured hiring workflows.

Key Features

  • Pre-recorded and live video interviewing capabilities
  • Structured rating systems for consistent candidate evaluation
  • Advanced scheduling tools for complex interview coordination
  • Customizable workflows for specific hiring processes
  • Compliance-focused documentation and security features

The platform emphasizes structured assessment through standardized rating criteria, making it popular with organizations requiring rigorous compliance in their hiring processes.

Pricing and Value Comparison

VidCruiter typically requires custom pricing based on organization size and needs, with industry estimates suggesting implementation costs. This positions it as a premium enterprise solution compared to the more accessible pricing of myInterview and Hirevire.

The platform's value proposition centers on reducing legal risks through standardized evaluation rather than myInterview's focus on simplicity and accessibility.

Strengths and Limitations

Strengths:

  • Robust compliance features for regulated industries
  • Comprehensive structured evaluation frameworks
  • Advanced scheduling automation across time zones
  • Strong security controls and documentation

Limitations:

  • Significant implementation time requirements
  • Higher cost barrier for smaller organizations
  • Complex interface with steeper learning curve
  • Less emphasis on candidate experience than alternatives

User Ratings and Testimonials

VidCruiter maintains strong ratings among enterprise users:

  • G2: 4.8/5 (230+ reviews)
  • Capterra: 4.6/5 (120+ reviews)

"VidCruiter's structured evaluation system has standardized our hiring across 12 locations while ensuring compliance with industry regulations," reports a Healthcare Recruitment Director, though smaller organizations note that "the implementation timeline and costs can be challenging without dedicated resources."

Best For

VidCruiter is ideal for large enterprises and organizations in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) that prioritize compliance, structured evaluation frameworks, and comprehensive documentation over simplified user experiences. Organizations seeking quick implementation or budget-friendly solutions may find better alignment with platforms like Hirevire.

Comprehensive Comparison Table

Feature
Hirevire
RecRight
Outmatch
Spark Hire
VidCruiter
myInterview
Starting Price
$39/month
Contact Sales
Contact Sales
$299/month
Custom Quote
Free tier available
Video Interviews






Audio Responses






Text Responses






File Uploads






No Login Required






AI Transcription
90+ languages

Limited



Unlimited Responses






Zapier Integration
5000+ apps
Limited



Limited
Custom Branding






Team Collaboration






Mobile Support






Free Trial

Varies




G2 Rating
4.7/5
4.8/5
4.2/5
4.7/5
4.6/5
3.9/5
Capterra Rating
5/5
4.8/5
4.1/5
4.7/5
4.5/5
4.1/5

How to Choose the Right Alternative to myInterview

Selecting the optimal video interviewing platform requires careful consideration of your organization's specific needs, priorities, and constraints. Here's a framework for evaluation:

Assess Your Primary Pain Points

Begin by identifying your most significant challenges in the current recruitment process. Different platforms excel at addressing different problems:

  • Scheduling coordination issues? Hirevire's asynchronous approach eliminates scheduling entirely, while myInterview offers similar benefits but with potential login friction.
  • Candidate experience friction? Platforms like Hirevire that don't require logins or downloads create the least friction, while myInterview's potential account requirements may create additional steps.
  • Assessment format limitations? Hirevire's multi-format capabilities provide flexibility beyond video, while myInterview's video-only approach may limit certain evaluation scenarios.
  • Budget constraints? Hirevire offers the most accessible starting price with unlimited usage, while myInterview's tiered approach may create cost concerns as volume increases.
  • Compliance requirements? VidCruiter provides the strongest compliance features, while Hirevire and myInterview offer more streamlined approaches with less regulatory emphasis.

Understanding your specific challenges will help prioritize platform capabilities that address your most pressing recruitment pain points.

Consider Your Organization's Scale

Your hiring volume and organizational size significantly impact which platform represents the best value:

  • Small business or occasional hiring? Hirevire's $39/month plan or myInterview's free tier provide accessible entry points, though Hirevire's unlimited responses may offer better long-term value.
  • Mid-sized business with regular hiring? Hirevire's unlimited usage model prevents scaling concerns, while myInterview's tiered approach may become costly as volume increases.
  • Enterprise with complex requirements? Outmatch or VidCruiter offer enterprise-grade capabilities, though with higher implementation complexity and cost compared to more accessible alternatives.
  • Recruitment agency? Spark Hire or Hirevire's Growth plan offer features specifically designed for agency workflows and client presentation.

The right platform should align with both your current scale and anticipated growth to avoid implementation churn as your needs evolve.

Making the Switch: Migration Strategies