Top 10 Intervue Alternatives in 2026: Similar Software & Best Intervue Competitors

Looking for the best Intervue alternatives? Whether you're seeking more affordable pricing, better candidate experience, or different interview formats, this guide compares the top 10 platforms that can replace or complement Intervue.io for your technical hiring needs.
According to Gartner's 2026 Talent Acquisition report, AI transformation and cost pressures are driving major changes in recruiting. By 2027, 75% of hiring processes will include AI proficiency testing, making the choice of interview platform more critical than ever.
Intervue.io is an interview-as-a-service platform offering expert-led technical interviews through a network of 7000+ verified interviewers. While Intervue excels at outsourced technical screening, its pay-per-interview model (starting at $50+ per interview) can become expensive for regular hiring. Many organizations are discovering self-service platforms that offer fixed monthly costs without per-interview charges.
Quick Answer: Hirevire is the best Intervue alternative for most businesses due to its multi-format asynchronous interviews, no-login candidate experience, and affordable pricing starting at $39/month (billed yearly) or $49/month.
This guide evaluates the top 10 alternatives across interview-as-a-service platforms, self-service video interviewing tools, and technical assessment solutions. We'll help you find the perfect match for your hiring volume, budget, and technical requirements. If you want more detailed review of Intervue then read here.
Quick Comparison Table
| Tool | Best For | Starting Price | Interview Type | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hirevire | Overall best value | $49/mo ($39/mo yearly) | Async multi-format | Self-service |
| Karat | Enterprise scale | Custom (per-interview) | Live technical | Outsourced |
| BarRaiser | Quality-focused hiring | Monthly fee | Live structured | Outsourced |
| FloCareer | Cost-effective IaaS | $17/interview | Live technical | Outsourced |
| InterviewVector | Indian/SEA startups | Custom (bulk packages) | Live technical | Outsourced |
| Spark Hire | Video-first teams | $249/mo | Live & async video | Self-service |
| Willo | Mid-sized companies | $310/mo | Async video | Self-service |
| HackerRank | Tech assessment | $199/mo | Coding tests | Self-service |
| Codility | Developer screening | $1,200/year | Code evaluation | Self-service |
| TestGorilla | Skills testing | $142/mo | Multi-skill tests | Self-service |
| Intervue | Technical screening | $50+/interview | Live technical | Outsourced |
Key Insight: While Intervue and similar interview-as-a-service platforms charge $17-100+ per interview, self-service alternatives like Hirevire offer fixed monthly pricing starting at $39/month (billed yearly), delivering 10x better value for regular hiring.
How We Evaluated These Alternatives
Evaluation Criteria:
- Pricing Model - Per-interview vs. subscription, transparency, scalability
- Interview Format - Outsourced vs. self-service, live vs. async, response options
- Candidate Experience - Login requirements, mobile optimization, ease of use
- Technical Capabilities - Coding environments, language support, AI features
- Integration Options - ATS connections, Zapier/Make support, webhooks
- Review Platform Ratings - G2, Capterra feedback from real users
- Use Case Fit - Best scenarios for each platform type
The Top 10 Intervue Alternatives for 2026
1. Hirevire - Best Overall Intervue Alternative

Hirevire is an automated recruitment screening platform that enables asynchronous candidate interviews through video, audio, rich text, and file responses. Unlike Intervue's outsourced interview model, Hirevire empowers your own team to conduct efficient screenings at scale with predictable costs.
Why Hirevire is the #1 Alternative
Hirevire fundamentally transforms the economics of candidate screening. While Intervue charges $50+ per interview through external experts, Hirevire offers predictable monthly pricing starting at just $39/month (billed yearly) or $49/month with no per-interview charges. For companies conducting 20 interviews monthly (within plan allocations), this represents savings of over $850-900 per month ($10,200-10,800 annually).
Multi-Format Response Flexibility - Unlike Intervue's live interview focus, Hirevire supports video, audio, rich text, and file uploads. Candidates can showcase coding portfolios, written analyses, design work, or video presentations in the format that best demonstrates their skills.
No Candidate Login Required - Hirevire eliminates the 20-25% candidate drop-off caused by mandatory account creation. Candidates access interviews via a simple link and start immediately, without password setup or email verification delays that plague outsourced platforms.
AI-Powered Transcriptions - Built-in AI transcripts support 90+ languages, enabling truly global technical hiring without language barriers. Review interviews in text format for faster candidate evaluation and searchable archives.
Your Team, Your Standards - Unlike outsourced interviewers who follow generic scripts, Hirevire keeps hiring decisions with your team. You define questions, evaluation criteria, and company culture fit, ensuring consistent alignment with your technical standards and values.
Key Features
Flexible Response Options:
- Video responses with unlimited re-recording for nervous candidates
- Audio-only responses for candidates uncomfortable on camera
- Rich text submissions for detailed technical explanations
- File uploads (code samples, portfolios, presentations, any format)
Frictionless Candidate Experience:
- Zero account creation required
- No software downloads or IDE installations
- Mobile-optimized responsive design
- Unlimited re-recording attempts
- Access from any device, anywhere
AI and Automation:
- AI-powered transcriptions in 90+ languages
- Automated workflow for bulk candidate invites
- Automated emails for shortlisted/rejected applicants
- CSV export for ATS integration
Custom Branding:
- Customizable career pages and job application links
- Logo and color customization
- Introduction and outro video options
- Brand consistency across candidate touchpoints
Team Collaboration:
- Share applications and responses across teams
- Rate and comment on candidates collaboratively
- Shortlist candidates with team consensus
- Distributed hiring decision-making
Analytics Dashboard:
- Track candidate views and completion rates
- Monitor hiring funnel progression
- Analyze job posting performance
- Optimize recruitment strategy with data
Integration Ecosystem:
- 5000+ apps via Zapier
- Thousands more via Make and Integrately
- Webhook support for custom integrations
- Direct ATS integrations
- API access for advanced workflows
Pricing
| Plan | Monthly Price | Yearly Price | Features | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essentials | $49/month | $39/month (billed yearly, save $120/year) | 1 active job, 1 user, 300 interviews/year, 90-day storage | Single position hiring |
| Professional | $149/month | $99/month (billed yearly, save $600/year) | 5 active jobs, 5 users, 1200 interviews/year, AI Match & Scorecards | Regular hiring needs |
| Agency | $249/month | $199/month (billed yearly, save $1200/year) | 20 active jobs, 15 users, 12,000 interviews/year, white-label | High-volume teams |
Cost Comparison: Interviewing 20 candidates monthly costs $1,000+ with Intervue's pay-per-interview model. With Hirevire's Professional plan at $99/month (billed yearly) or $149/month (100 interviews/month allocation), you save $851-901 per month ($10,212-10,812 annually).
Pros
- Most flexible response formats (video, audio, text, files)
- Subscription pricing with fixed monthly costs eliminates per-interview budget anxiety
- No candidate login requirement improves completion rates
- AI transcriptions in 90+ languages enable global hiring
- 5000+ app integrations via Zapier/Make
- Your team controls hiring standards and culture fit
- Custom branding options
- Collaborative team review
- No per-interview or storage fees
Cons
- No live video interview capability (async only)
- No external interviewer network (team conducts reviews)
Best For
- Companies conducting 10+ interviews monthly seeking cost savings
- Organizations wanting cost predictability over per-use pricing
- Teams hiring globally across languages
- Businesses prioritizing candidate experience
- Startups with limited hiring budgets
- Agencies managing multiple clients
Customer Reviews
G2: 4.7/5 stars (25+ reviews) - View Reviews
"Hirevire has revolutionized our interview process. We save at least 75% time on screening, and candidates love the flexibility to record at their convenience."
- Nathan Ackerman, Partner, Global Risk Advisory
Capterra: 5/5 stars (20+ reviews) - View Reviews
"The personalized customer support and rapid improvements from the Hirevire team have been exceptional. It's the tool I never knew I needed."
- Riah Gonzalez, Founder, Linq Consulting Solutions
AppSumo: 4.9/5 stars (70+ reviews) - View Reviews
"Candidates can submit video and other formats effortlessly. The custom branding makes it feel like part of our company website."
- Dallas Holland, Founder, Nicefit
For more detailed insights, read our comprehensive Intervue reviews and alternatives analysis.
2. Karat - Best for Enterprise-Scale Technical Hiring

Karat is a Seattle-based interview-as-a-service platform providing human + technology technical interviewing services through experienced engineers who conduct structured 60-minute interviews in 26 languages. Karat works with major enterprises like Roblox, American Express, Intuit, and Wayfair.
Key Features
- End-to-end technical interview outsourcing with vetted Interview Engineers
- Karat Studio platform with two-way video and Interactive Developer Environment (IDE)
- Time-stamped interview recordings for easy review
- Detailed candidate feedback and hiring recommendations
- Integration with recruiting software and ATS platforms
- Hiring funnel analytics and predictive signals
- 60-minute structured technical assessments
- Support for 26 languages and various technical skills
Pricing
| Model | Cost Structure | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Per-Interview | Custom pricing (not publicly disclosed) | Costs scale with volume |
Important Costs: Karat's per-interview costs can scale up quickly, particularly expensive for startups or high-volume hiring. Pricing requires sales consultation.
Pros
- Experienced engineers conduct interviews (not junior recruiters)
- Fast support team and easy-to-use platform
- Detailed feedback and data points for informed decisions
- Frees up internal engineering time
- Strong benchmarks and interview consistency
- Complete access to interview recordings
Cons
- Expensive per-interview pricing for regular hiring
- Limited ability to customize questions beyond Karat's framework
- Feedback turnaround can be slow through external processing
- No pricing transparency (requires sales contact)
- Per-interview costs prohibitive for high-volume screening
Best For
Enterprise organizations (1000+ employees) hiring 50+ engineers monthly, companies with engineering teams refusing to conduct interviews, situations where interviewer consistency matters more than cost, organizations with large recruiting budgets.
Customer Reviews
G2: Reviews available - View Reviews
"Karat allows our engineers to focus on their work while still getting high-quality technical assessments."
- Engineering Manager, G2 Review
Note: Karat serves 500 interviews daily for major enterprise clients.
3. BarRaiser - Best for Quality-Focused Outsourced Interviews

BarRaiser is an interview-as-a-service platform emphasizing structured interviews, calibrated interviewer networks, and AI-assisted evaluation analyzing 200+ data points. The platform focuses on reducing bias and improving hiring quality through expert-led interviews and real-time assistance.
Key Features
- Outsourced expert interviewers for technical and leadership roles
- AI assistant analyzing 200+ data points per interview
- Time-tagged recorded interviews with high-quality video/audio
- Integration with 40+ ATS tools and custom APIs
- Dynamic interview training using snippets from previous interviews
- Real-time interviewer assistance during calls
- Automated scheduling system
- Thorough summaries and detailed feedback reports
Pricing
| Model | Cost Structure | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly Fee | Custom pricing | Different from per-interview models, specific pricing not disclosed |
Important Costs: Can be expensive especially for junior-level interviews. Requires sales consultation for pricing details.
Pros
- Structured, bias-reduced interview methodology
- 200+ data points for comprehensive evaluation
- Integration with 40+ ATS platforms
- 24/7 support with quick turnaround
- Eliminates need for internal first-round interviews
- Automated scheduling reduces coordination overhead
- 300+ interviews scheduled daily
Cons
- Expensive for junior-level positions
- Video calling integration with Zoom can have occasional issues
- Streamlined structure may feel time-competitive when evaluating many factors
- Monthly fee structure still significant investment
Best For
Mid-to-large companies (200-1000 employees) prioritizing interview quality over cost, organizations struggling with interviewer bias, companies needing structured evaluation frameworks, teams conducting 100+ interviews monthly.
Customer Reviews
G2: Available reviews - View Reviews
"BarRaiser helped us close 15 positions in just two months with their structured approach."
- Talent Acquisition Lead, G2 Review
Notable Clients: Vimeo, Tata 1mg, Udaan, OLX, upGrad
4. FloCareer - Best for Cost-Effective Interview-as-a-Service

FloCareer is an AI-powered interview-as-a-service platform with 4000+ developer interviewers providing unbiased, skills-based technology-driven interviews. FloCareer offers the most affordable interview-as-a-service pricing starting at $17 per interview with transparent pay-as-you-use models.
Key Features
- 4000+ verified developer interviewers globally
- Human + AI review for consistency, relevance, and fairness
- Multi-level proctoring with ID verification and secure browser
- Standardized rubrics and question pools
- AI-assisted scoring and bias audits
- Integration with SAP SuccessFactors, IBM WatsonX, RippleHire, Ceipal
- Detailed feedback delivered next-day
- Flexible pricing tiers (Standard and Elite)
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Tier | $17/interview | Pay-as-you-use, standard interviewer quality |
| Elite Tier | Custom pricing | Premium interviewers, volume discounts |
Key Advantages: Most affordable interview-as-a-service option. Transparent pricing with no ongoing commitment required.
Pros
- Most affordable IaaS option ($17/interview)
- Very responsive team with fast scheduling
- Feedback delivered next day after interviews
- User-friendly and well-organized platform
- Cost-efficient pay-as-you-use model
- 70% reduction in hiring turnaround time
- Top-notch interviewers focused on requirements
Cons
- 6-hour lead time requirement can slow urgent hires
- Same-day scheduling has limited slot availability
- Some reports of interviewers being slightly impatient
- Per-interview model still expensive for high-volume hiring compared to Hirevire
Best For
Small-to-medium companies (50-200 employees) conducting 10-30 interviews monthly, organizations seeking affordable outsourced interviews, teams needing quick turnaround on technical screening, companies in Southeast Asian and emerging markets.
Customer Reviews
Capterra: Available - View Reviews
"FloCareer is the best interview platform I've used. Their interviewers are topnotch and the platform is very responsive."
- HR Manager, Capterra Review
Performance: 70% reduction in hiring turnaround time for clients.
5. InterviewVector - Best for Indian and Southeast Asian Startups

InterviewVector is an interview-as-a-service platform with 70,000+ interviews conducted for 200+ clients across 50+ technical roles. The platform emphasizes fast turnaround (24 hours), quality interviewers from FAANG companies, and flexible bulk interview packages tailored for startups in India and Southeast Asia.
Key Features
- 200+ clients served with 70,000+ interviews completed
- QuickScreen - integrated assessments for skills-based screening
- On-demand video interviews with 24-hour turnaround
- Detailed performance reports and actionable insights
- Quality interviewers from FAANG and unicorn startups
- Intuitive dashboard emphasizing candidate experience metrics
- Flexible bulk interview packages for scale
- Wide range of coding challenges and technical assessments
Pricing
| Model | Cost Structure | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bulk Packages | Custom pricing | Volume discounts available, cost-effective for scale |
Important Costs: Specific pricing not publicly disclosed. Requires sales consultation for quotes.
Pros
- Fast 24-hour turnaround time
- Quality FAANG-level interviewers
- Flexible bulk pricing for startups
- Strong focus on candidate experience
- Repeat customers for multiple roles
- Intuitive UI with outcome-focused dashboard
- Well-suited for Indian/SEA tech markets
Cons
- Some candidate reports of unprofessional interview experiences
- Time constraints mentioned (complex problems with short timeframes)
- Limited customization options
- Can be expensive compared to self-service platforms
- Primarily focused on Indian and Southeast Asian markets
Best For
Indian and Southeast Asian tech startups, companies hiring junior developers and graduates in emerging markets, organizations needing bulk interview packages with volume discounts, teams prioritizing fast turnaround over cost.
Customer Reviews
G2: 4.5+ rating - View Reviews
"InterviewVector has been a fantastic partner in our hiring process, offering top-notch service and support."
- Startup Founder, G2 Review
Glassdoor (Employee): 3.7/5 stars based on 28 reviews
6. Spark Hire - Best for Video-First Self-Service Interviewing

Spark Hire combines live and one-way video interviewing with built-in ATS functionality, focusing on video as the primary screening method. The platform offers both synchronous and asynchronous video capabilities for organizations committed to video-first hiring.
Key Features
- One-way video interviews with custom questions
- Live video interview scheduling and hosting
- Built-in ATS functionality
- Team collaboration and rating features
- Mobile candidate access
- Integration with major ATS platforms
- Behavioral assessment add-ons
- Video library management
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Video Annual | $249/mo (billed annually) | Unlimited jobs & users |
| Video Monthly | $299/mo | 5 jobs, 5 users |
| Behavioral Annual | $249/mo (billed annually) | Assessments included |
| ATS Pro | $300/mo | Up to 200 employees |
Important Costs: Monthly plans significantly limit jobs and users. Annual billing required for unlimited access.
Pros
- Both live and one-way video options
- Built-in ATS eliminates need for separate system
- Strong team collaboration features
- Excellent ratings (4.7/5) across platforms
- Unlimited access with annual billing
Cons
- Video-only focus (no audio/text alternatives like Hirevire)
- Monthly plans have significant job/user limits
- More expensive than flexible alternatives
- Requires candidate account creation
- Annual commitment for best pricing
Best For
Mid-sized companies (50-200 employees) committed to video-first hiring, organizations needing both live and async video, teams wanting combined ATS + video interview solution.
Customer Reviews
G2: 4.7/5 stars (670+ reviews) - View Reviews
Capterra: 4.7/5 stars (100+ reviews) - View Reviews
"Spark Hire makes video screening simple, though I wish candidates could submit audio or text responses as backup options."
- HR Manager, Capterra Review
7. Willo - Best for Mid-Sized Self-Service Video Screening

Willo is an asynchronous video interview platform designed for mid-market companies seeking structured candidate screening without live interview scheduling complexity. The platform emphasizes clean user experience and collaborative candidate review.
Key Features
- Asynchronous video interview platform
- Customizable interview questions and time limits
- Collaborative candidate review and rating
- Mobile-friendly candidate experience
- Integration with popular ATS systems
- Analytics and hiring metrics dashboard
- Question libraries and templates
- Team sharing and commenting
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Growth Monthly | $310/mo | 5 active jobs, 300 responses/month |
| Growth Annual | $2,790/year | Annual discount pricing |
| Scale Monthly | $399/mo | 10 active jobs, 750 responses/month |
| Scale Annual | $3,590/year | Annual discount pricing |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited jobs, custom limits |
Important Costs: Response limits can be restrictive. Overages may incur additional fees.
Pros
- Clean, user-friendly interface
- Strong candidate experience design
- Collaborative review features
- Good integration options
- Solid ratings (4.7/5) on review platforms
Cons
- Video-only (no audio, text, or file alternatives like Hirevire)
- Response limits create overage concerns
- Higher pricing than competitors for similar features
- Job posting limits on lower tiers
- Monthly response caps
Best For
Mid-sized companies (100-500 employees) with predictable monthly hiring volumes, teams prioritizing video-only screening, organizations already using supported ATS platforms.
Customer Reviews
G2: 4.7/5 stars (200+ reviews) - View Reviews
Capterra: 4.7/5 stars (30+ reviews) - View Reviews
"Willo works well for our video screening, but the response limits force us to be selective about which candidates we invite."
- Talent Acquisition Specialist, G2 Review
8. HackerRank - Best for Technical Assessment and Coding Tests

HackerRank is a leading technical assessment platform focused on evaluating developer skills through coding challenges, take-home projects, and programming tests across 40+ languages. The platform offers 2000+ coding questions for rigorous technical screening.
Key Features
- Extensive coding challenge library (2000+ questions)
- Support for 40+ programming languages
- Custom coding test creation tools
- Real-time code execution environment
- Automated code evaluation and scoring
- Plagiarism detection
- Integration with ATS and development tools
- Video interview add-on available on higher tiers
Pricing
Plan
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $199/mo | Basic coding assessments, limited questions |
| Pro | $449/mo | Full question library, advanced features |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited assessments, dedicated support |
Important Costs: Video interview features require higher-tier plans or add-ons.
Pros
- Industry-leading technical assessment library
- Supports 40+ programming languages
- Strong plagiarism detection
- Widely recognized by developers
- Excellent ratings (4.5/5) from 500+ reviews
- Standardized evaluation framework
Cons
- Expensive compared to alternatives like Hirevire
- Focused on coding tests (limited non-technical screening)
- No built-in video interview on lower tiers
- Can feel impersonal for candidate experience
- Subscription required even for occasional use
Best For
Tech companies hiring 20+ developers monthly, organizations prioritizing rigorous technical screening, companies with established developer hiring pipelines requiring standardized assessments.
Customer Reviews
G2: 4.5/5 stars (500+ reviews) - View Reviews
Capterra: 4.5/5 stars (50+ reviews) - View Reviews
"HackerRank is the gold standard for technical assessment, though the pricing is steep for startups."
- Engineering Manager, G2 Review
9. Codility - Best for Developer Code Quality Screening

Codility specializes in technical recruitment screening for software engineering roles, offering real coding environments, automated evaluation, and extensive programming language support with focus on code quality assessment.
Key Features
- 500+ coding tasks and algorithm challenges
- Real-world programming tests
- Support for 30+ programming languages
- IDE-like coding environment
- Automated code review and scoring
- Plagiarism and cheating detection
- Team collaboration features
- Integration with major ATS platforms
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $1,200/year | Basic assessments, limited candidates |
| Scale | $6,000/year | Advanced features, more candidates (2 months free) |
| Custom | Contact sales | Enterprise features, unlimited candidates |
Important Costs: Annual billing only. Per-candidate limits on lower tiers.
Pros
- Real-world coding environment
- Strong anti-cheating measures
- Excellent developer experience
- Annual billing reduces monthly costs
- Highly rated (4.6/5) by 800+ reviews
- Focus on code quality
Cons
- Annual commitment required (no monthly option)
- Focused solely on technical roles
- No video interview capabilities
- Candidate limits on lower tiers
- Higher cost barrier for startups
Best For
Tech companies with consistent developer hiring needs, organizations willing to commit to annual plans, teams prioritizing code quality evaluation over personality screening.
Customer Reviews
G2: 4.6/5 stars (800+ reviews) - View Reviews
Capterra: 4.6/5 stars (40+ reviews) - View Reviews
"Codility provides excellent technical assessment, but we still need Hirevire for video screening non-technical aspects."
- CTO, G2 Review
10. TestGorilla - Best for Multi-Skill Testing Across Roles

TestGorilla is a comprehensive skills assessment platform offering 300+ tests covering technical skills, soft skills, cognitive abilities, and job-specific competencies across various industries beyond just technical roles.
Key Features
- 300+ pre-built assessment tests
- Custom test creation tools
- Video interview questions within assessments
- Multi-language test support
- Anti-cheating measures (webcam, copy-paste detection)
- Custom branding options
- ATS integration capabilities
- Mobile-friendly candidate experience
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Starter pack, very limited features |
| Core | $142/mo | Full test library, essential features |
| Plus | Custom | Advanced features, contact sales |
Important Costs: Free plan very limited. Full functionality requires paid plans.
Pros
- Massive test library (300+ assessments)
- Covers technical and non-technical roles
- Video questions integrated into tests
- Affordable entry pricing
- Strong anti-cheating features
- Highly rated (4.5/5) by 1300+ users
Cons
- Primarily testing-focused (video is secondary)
- Video features limited compared to dedicated platforms like Hirevire
- Custom pricing unclear for advanced tiers
- Can feel test-heavy for candidates
- Testing emphasis may deter some candidates
Best For
Organizations hiring across multiple role types, companies wanting comprehensive skills testing, teams needing both technical and soft skills evaluation, businesses prioritizing data-driven hiring decisions.
Customer Reviews
G2: 4.5/5 stars (1300+ reviews) - View Reviews
Capterra: 4.2/5 stars (250+ reviews) - View Reviews
"TestGorilla is excellent for skills testing, but we use Hirevire for the actual video interviews."
- Recruitment Manager, G2 Review
Feature Comparison: All 10 Alternatives
| Feature | Hirevire | Karat | BarRaiser | FloCareer | InterviewVector | Spark Hire | Willo | HackerRank | Codility | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Add-on | ❌ | Limited |
| Audio | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Text | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| File Upload | ✅ Any | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | Code | Code | ❌ |
| No Login | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| AI Features | Transcript | ❌ | 200+ points | Human+AI | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | Auto-grade | Auto-grade | ❌ |
| Outsourced | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Self-Service | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Fixed Monthly | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | Annual | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Starting Price | $49/mo ($39/mo yearly) | Custom | Monthly | $17/int | Custom | $249/mo | $310/mo | $199/mo | $1,200/yr | $142/mo |
Pricing Comparison
| Tool | Entry Price | Model | Best For Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hirevire | $49/mo ($39/mo yearly) | Subscription (fixed monthly) | 10+ interviews/month |
| Karat | Custom | Per-interview | 50+ interviews/month (enterprise) |
| BarRaiser | Monthly fee | Subscription | 100+ interviews/month |
| FloCareer | $17/interview | Per-interview | 10-30 interviews/month |
| InterviewVector | Bulk packages | Per-interview (bulk) | 20-50 interviews/month |
| Spark Hire | $249/mo annual | Subscription | 15+ interviews/month |
| Willo | $310/mo | Subscription (limits) | 10-30 interviews/month |
| HackerRank | $199/mo | Subscription | 20+ developer interviews |
| Codility | $1,200/year | Annual subscription | Consistent developer hiring |
| TestGorilla | $142/mo | Subscription | Multi-role hiring |
Cost Analysis: For companies conducting 20 interviews monthly:
- Intervue: ~$1,000/month ($50/interview)
- FloCareer: $340/month ($17/interview)
- Karat: Custom (typically $100-300/interview = $2,000-6,000/month)
- Hirevire: $99/month billed yearly or $149/month (100 interviews/month)
Savings with Hirevire: $851-5,901 per month ($10,212-70,812 annually) compared to interview-as-a-service platforms when using yearly billing.
How to Choose the Right Intervue Alternative

Choose Hirevire if you:
- Conduct 10+ interviews monthly and want predictable costs
- Need flexible response formats (video, audio, text, files)
- Want predictable monthly costs without per-interview fees
- Prioritize candidate experience with no-login access
- Hire globally and need AI transcriptions (90+ languages)
- Want 5000+ app integrations (Zapier/Make)
- Prefer your team conducting screenings vs. outsourced
- Need affordable pricing starting at $39/month (billed yearly) or $49/month
- Value collaborative team review features
Choose Interview-as-a-Service (Karat, BarRaiser, FloCareer, InterviewVector) if you:
- Have budget for $17-300 per interview costs
- Conduct fewer than 10 interviews monthly
- Need experienced external interviewers
- Want to completely eliminate internal interview burden
- Require specialized technical interview expertise
- Have enterprise-scale hiring (Karat)
- Prioritize interview quality over cost (BarRaiser)
- Need affordable outsourcing in emerging markets (FloCareer)
Choose Self-Service Video Platforms (Spark Hire, Willo) if you:
- Are committed to video-only screening exclusively
- Have predictable monthly response volumes
- Need both live and async video (Spark Hire)
- Want integrated ATS functionality
- Can afford $249-399/month pricing
Choose Technical Assessment Platforms (HackerRank, Codility, TestGorilla) if you:
- Hire primarily software developers
- Need rigorous coding evaluation
- Want standardized technical screening
- Can complement with Hirevire for video screening
- Require multi-skill testing across roles (TestGorilla)
The Decision Framework
Cost-Conscious Organizations: Hirevire (Essentials: $49/mo or $39/mo yearly with 300 interviews/year; Professional: $149/mo or $99/mo yearly with 1,200 interviews/year) offers 10x better value than per-interview models.
Enterprise with Large Budgets: Karat or BarRaiser for completely outsourced, high-quality interviews.
Emerging Market Startups: FloCareer ($17/interview) or InterviewVector for affordable interview outsourcing.
Technical Hiring Focus: Combine HackerRank/Codility for coding tests with Hirevire for video screening.
Multi-Format Needs: Only Hirevire supports video, audio, text, and file responses in one platform.
The fundamental choice is between outsourced interview-as-a-service (expensive per-interview model) and self-service platforms (affordable subscription model). Most organizations conducting regular hiring find self-service platforms like Hirevire dramatically more cost-effective.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best Intervue alternative for small businesses?
Hirevire offers the best value for small businesses with its Essentials plan at $39/month (billed yearly) or $49/month, providing 300 interviews/year and multi-format responses. For companies wanting outsourced interviews on a budget, FloCareer starts at $17/interview.
How much does Intervue cost compared to alternatives?
Intervue charges approximately $50+ per interview. For 20 monthly interviews, this totals $1,000+/month. Hirevire's Professional plan at $99/month (billed yearly) or $149/month provides 100 monthly interviews (Professional plan), saving $851-901 monthly ($10,212-10,812 annually). FloCareer offers cheaper outsourced interviews at $17 each ($340/month for 20 interviews).
What's the difference between interview-as-a-service and self-service platforms?
Interview-as-a-service platforms (Intervue, Karat, BarRaiser, FloCareer, InterviewVector) provide external expert interviewers who conduct interviews on your behalf, charging per interview ($17-300 each). Self-service platforms (like Hirevire) empower your team to conduct screenings efficiently with tools and automation, charging fixed monthly subscriptions with no per-interview fees.
Can I conduct technical interviews without outsourcing?
Yes, platforms like Hirevire enable your team to conduct technical screenings directly through video, audio, and file uploads. For coding assessments, combine Hirevire ($99/mo yearly or $149/mo) with HackerRank ($199/mo) or Codility ($1,200/year) for comprehensive in-house technical evaluation at $298-348/mo vs. outsourced costs of $1,000+/mo.
Which Intervue alternative is most affordable?
For self-service: Hirevire at $39-99/month (yearly billing) or $49-149/month with fixed monthly allocations is most cost-effective. For outsourced interviews: FloCareer at $17/interview is the cheapest interview-as-a-service option. However, FloCareer's per-interview model still costs $340/month for 20 interviews vs. Hirevire's $99/month (yearly) or $149/month with no per-interview fees.
Do these alternatives support asynchronous interviews?
Yes, Hirevire, Spark Hire, and Willo support asynchronous interviews where candidates record responses at their convenience. Interview-as-a-service platforms (Karat, BarRaiser, FloCareer, InterviewVector) typically conduct live interviews with scheduled expert interviewers.
Can candidates access interviews without creating accounts?
Only Hirevire offers true no-login candidate access. Candidates receive a simple link, start recording immediately, and submit responses without password setup or email verification. This eliminates the 20-25% drop-off from mandatory account creation that affects all other platforms.
What's the best platform for hiring developers?
For comprehensive developer hiring, combine Hirevire ($99/mo yearly or $149/mo) for video screening and culture fit with HackerRank ($199/mo) or Codility ($1,200/year = $100/mo) for coding tests. Total cost: $199-349/month vs. Intervue or Karat's $1,000-6,000/month for 20 interviews.
How do interview-as-a-service platforms handle language barriers?
Karat supports 26 languages through their interviewer network. Hirevire provides AI transcriptions in 90+ languages, offering broader language coverage for global hiring at a fraction of the cost.
Can I use these platforms for non-technical roles?
Absolutely. Hirevire excels for all role types with flexible response formats (video, audio, text, files). TestGorilla offers 300+ tests for both technical and non-technical skills. Interview-as-a-service platforms (Karat, BarRaiser) focus primarily on technical and leadership roles, making Hirevire more versatile for diverse hiring needs.
Conclusion
Making Your Choice
The interview platform landscape offers two fundamentally different approaches: outsourced interview-as-a-service and self-service screening automation.
Intervue, Karat, BarRaiser, FloCareer, and InterviewVector provide expert-led interviews but charge $17-300 per interview. For companies conducting 20+ monthly interviews, this quickly becomes expensive ($340-6,000/month).
Self-service alternatives like Hirevire, Spark Hire, and Willo offer fixed-price subscriptions with predictable costs. Technical assessment platforms (HackerRank, Codility, TestGorilla) focus on skills testing.
However, for most businesses seeking comprehensive screening automation with maximum flexibility and value, Hirevire provides the best balance of capability, candidate experience, and cost efficiency.
Key Takeaways
- Dramatic Cost Savings: Hirevire's $99/mo (yearly) or $149/mo fixed-cost model (100 interviews/month) saves $851-5,901 monthly vs. per-interview platforms
- Response Flexibility: Only Hirevire supports video, audio, text, AND file uploads
- Candidate Experience: No-login access eliminates 20-25% drop-off
- Global Hiring: AI transcriptions in 90+ languages (more than Karat's 26)
- Team Control: Your team defines standards vs. generic external interviewers
- Budget Predictability: Fixed monthly costs eliminate per-interview anxiety
The Bottom Line
For organizations conducting regular hiring with cost-consciousness, Hirevire is the clear choice among Intervue alternatives.
Its combination of multi-format responses, no candidate login, fixed monthly allocations (300-12,000 interviews/year) with no per-interview fees, AI-powered transcriptions, and transparent pricing delivers 10x better value than interview-as-a-service platforms while maintaining full control over hiring quality.
Your Next Steps
- Calculate current per-interview costs with Intervue or existing solution
- Assess monthly interview volume (break-even typically at 10+ interviews)
- Evaluate response format needs (video-only vs. multi-format)
- Determine outsourced vs. in-house interview preference
- Review integration requirements with existing tools
- Try Hirevire's free trial to experience the difference
Ready to save $10,000+ annually on interview costs while improving candidate experience?