safety critical operationsbvlos waiverpart 107seed pod dispersaluav operations
Complete evaluation framework
What to assess and how to score it
Review the evidence signals before interviewing. Then use the anchored descriptions—not instinct alone—to choose the score that best matches each answer.
01
Evaluation factor
Ratings and technical competence
30% weight
Verify current remote pilot certification (Part 107 or national equivalent), Remote ID compliance, and hands-on hours on heavy-lift multirotors carrying seed pod or aerial seeding payloads.
Evidence to listen for
Holds the current ratings, licences, or endorsements the position requires
Knows the rules, minima, and standards cold, not approximately
Familiar with the equipment and airspace, network, or plant in question
Clear on the boundary of their own authority
Five-point scoring guide
1
Poor
Lacks required ratings, or shaky on the standards that keep people alive.
2
Needs Improvement
Holds the ticket but hesitant on rules and minima.
3
Satisfactory
Competent and current; slower on unfamiliar configurations.
4
Very Good
Rules and minima are second nature; strong on the specific environment.
5
Excellent
Holds current certification with logged heavy-lift hours, names airframes flown, and describes payload calibration for pod weight and dispersal spacing.
02
Evaluation factor
Situational awareness under load
30% weight
Probe how they track multiple aircraft, canopy obstacles, and shifting wind over remote terrain: GCS telemetry watch, RTK signal loss, battery reserve thresholds, visual observer coordination.
Evidence to listen for
Keeps the whole picture while handling one problem
Describes how they shed or reprioritise tasks when volume spikes
Notices the thing that has gone quiet, not just the thing that is loud
Knows their own saturation point and says so before reaching it
Five-point scoring guide
1
Poor
Tunnel vision under load; loses the wider picture entirely.
2
Needs Improvement
Copes at normal volume; degrades badly when it spikes.
3
Satisfactory
Holds the picture in most conditions; occasional fixation.
4
Very Good
Maintains awareness under high load and reprioritises deliberately.
5
Excellent
Monitors telemetry, weather, and terrain simultaneously; describes concrete abort thresholds for wind gusts, GPS degradation, and battery margin over roadless ground.
03
Evaluation factor
Decisions under pressure
25% weight
Test judgement on real events: flyaway, lost link over a burn scar, wildlife or crew below the flight path, aborting a planting block before a weather front closes in.
Evidence to listen for
Decides on incomplete information rather than freezing
Chooses the safe option when uncertain, and can say why
Recovers from their own error without concealing it
Can describe a real event where they made the call
Five-point scoring guide
1
Poor
Freezes, or gambles when the safe option was available.
2
Needs Improvement
Slow to commit; defers decisions that were theirs to make.
3
Satisfactory
Decides adequately in familiar situations.
4
Very Good
Decides quickly and safely, and owns errors openly.
5
Excellent
Recounts specific incidents with decision timing, chose safe termination over completing a planting block, and reported outcomes honestly afterwards.
04
Evaluation factor
Communication discipline
15% weight
Assess radio and reporting discipline: LAANC or airspace authorisation requests, NOTAM checks, briefing ground planting crews, landowner and forestry manager updates, post-flight logs and incident filings.
Evidence to listen for
Uses standard phraseology and readback discipline without shortcuts
Hands over completely, including what is unresolved
Speaks up to someone senior when safety requires it
Stays measured on the loop when the situation is not
Precise phraseology and complete handovers, and will challenge seniority on safety.
5
Excellent
Uses standard phraseology with observers and crews, documents each sortie and seeding coverage cleanly, and escalates airspace or equipment issues promptly.
Put this rubric to work
Score every candidate against the same standard
Add these weighted factors to Hirevire and let AI evaluate recorded answers against your rubric.
