Interview scorecard template

Counselor interview scorecard

Evaluate Counselor candidates across 4 weighted areas: clinical competence, patient safety and protocol, patient communication, and working in a clinical team. Clinical competence leads at 35%, so check licensure, modalities they are trained in, the populations they have worked with, and their supervision history. Use the rubric to compare role-specific evidence consistently.

See AI scoring
healthcare clinicalclinical practicecounselingmental healththerapy
TL;DR
For clinical competence, look for evidence the candidate currently licensed with genuine training in their stated modalities, and an active supervision or CPD practice. For patient safety and protocol, look for evidence the candidate assesses and escalates risk decisively, and is precise about mandatory reporting duties and their limits. Apply the written 1–5 anchors to every answer, record the evidence behind each rating, and use the factor weights to reach a consistent overall assessment.
Complete evaluation framework

What to assess and how to score it

Review the evidence signals before interviewing. Then use the anchored descriptions—not instinct alone—to choose the score that best matches each answer.

01
Evaluation factor

Clinical competence

35% weight

Check licensure, modalities they are trained in, the populations they have worked with, and their supervision history.

Evidence to listen for

  • Command of the procedures, anatomy, and equipment the role requires
  • Holds current registration or certification
  • Knows normal from abnormal and what to do about each
  • Recognises when a case is outside their scope

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

Unsafe knowledge gaps; registration missing or lapsed.

2
Needs Improvement

Knowledge gaps that would affect patient care.

3
Satisfactory

Competent for standard cases; needs support on complex ones.

4
Very Good

Strong clinical knowledge; safe and reliable across the usual range.

5
Excellent

Currently licensed with genuine training in their stated modalities, and an active supervision or CPD practice.

02
Evaluation factor

Patient safety and protocol

30% weight

Test risk assessment: how they recognise and act on disclosure of self-harm, abuse, or immediate danger.

Evidence to listen for

  • Follows identification, infection control, and documentation protocol without prompting
  • Can describe an error or near miss and what they did
  • Escalates deterioration early
  • Treats protocol as protection rather than bureaucracy

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

Casual about protocol; would not report an error.

2
Needs Improvement

Inconsistent protocol adherence; slow to escalate.

3
Satisfactory

Follows protocol reliably; documentation sometimes thin.

4
Very Good

Protocol is instinctive; escalates early and reports honestly.

5
Excellent

Assesses and escalates risk decisively, and is precise about mandatory reporting duties and their limits.

03
Evaluation factor

Patient communication

20% weight

Assess how they build a working relationship with a client who is hostile, silent, or attending under duress.

Evidence to listen for

  • Explains a procedure to an anxious or confused patient
  • Handles distress, pain, or refusal without losing control of the interaction
  • Respects privacy and dignity in practice, not just in principle
  • Works with families and carers

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

Dismissive of patients; no bedside awareness.

2
Needs Improvement

Task-focused; struggles with distressed patients.

3
Satisfactory

Adequate rapport; less confident in difficult interactions.

4
Very Good

Calm, clear, and respectful with anxious or difficult patients.

5
Excellent

Builds a working alliance with resistant or mandated clients without either colluding or pushing them away.

04
Evaluation factor

Working in a clinical team

15% weight

Judge boundary awareness, referral practice, and how they use supervision when a case exceeds their competence.

Evidence to listen for

  • Hands over cleanly and completely
  • Challenges a colleague when patient safety requires it
  • Takes direction from clinicians without deferring blindly
  • Handles shift work and pressure without becoming difficult to work with

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

Poor handover; cannot work in a clinical team.

2
Needs Improvement

Handover gaps; avoids raising concerns about colleagues.

3
Satisfactory

Reliable team member; handover adequate.

4
Very Good

Clean handovers and willing to speak up on safety.

5
Excellent

Clear boundaries and scope of practice, referring out and using supervision rather than working past their competence.

Evidence-led prompts

Interview questions for a Counselor

Use these prompts to surface evidence for the weighted factors above and compare candidates against the same role-specific criteria.

  1. 01

    State your full name, your licence type, licence number, and the state that issued it.

  2. 02

    Briefly describe your counseling experience so far: the settings you worked in, the populations you carried, and your typical weekly caseload.

  3. 03

    When a client presents with feelings of anxiety or depression, what tools do you use to assess severity and track change?

  4. 04

    What training do you have in working with clients who have a history of trauma or abuse?

  5. 05

    A client tells you mid-session that they feel an immediate threat to their own safety or someone else's. Walk me through your next ten minutes.

See the complete Counselor question set
Put this rubric to work

Score every candidate against the same standard

Add these weighted factors to Hirevire and let AI evaluate recorded answers against your rubric.

Explore AI Scorecards