Ask for closed revenue, average contract value, and close rate on their own calls, not the team's blended numbers.
Evidence to listen for Gives numbers: quota, attainment, deal size, client roster Explains the market and buyer they sold to, not just the product Distinguishes what they closed from what the team closed Can describe a deal they lost and whyFive-point scoring guide 1 Poor No numbers; cannot describe what they actually sold or to whom.
2 Needs Improvement Vague attainment; credit for team results is unclear.
3 Satisfactory Real record with some numbers; attribution occasionally fuzzy.
4 Very Good Clear numbers and ownership, including honest losses.
5 Excellent Gives their own close rate and contract values, cleanly separated from the team's blended results.
Test their call structure on long-cycle, high-value deals and how they handle a price objection without discounting reflexively.
Evidence to listen for Has a repeatable approach to qualifying and progressing deals Can walk a real deal from first contact to close Handles objections with questions rather than scripts Knows when to disqualifyFive-point scoring guide 1 Poor No method; pitches at everyone and hopes.
2 Needs Improvement Weak qualification; deals stall with no diagnosis.
3 Satisfactory Workable method; inconsistent on complex or long cycles.
4 Very Good Clear repeatable method; disqualifies early and deliberately.
5 Excellent Has a repeatable call structure for high-value deals and handles price with questions rather than discounts.
Assess how they coach reps and whether anyone they trained went on to hit quota.
Evidence to listen for Has clients or talent who came back or referred them Manages a difficult conversation without damaging the relationship Represents the client's interest, not only the commission Builds rapport across seniority levelsFive-point scoring guide 1 Poor Transactional; burns relationships for a close.
2 Needs Improvement Builds rapport but does not sustain relationships.
3 Satisfactory Solid relationships; less tested in conflict.
4 Very Good Repeat business and referrals; handles conflict without damage.
5 Excellent Has coached reps who then hit quota, and can describe what they changed in a specific rep's approach.
Judge how they behave in a bad month, and whether their pitch stays honest when the number is at risk.
Evidence to listen for Handles rejection and a bad quarter without unravelling Self-directed on pipeline rather than waiting for leads Coachable on feedback Honest in how they represent the product and themselvesFive-point scoring guide 1 Poor Gives up easily; blames leads, product, or market.
2 Needs Improvement Motivation depends on momentum; resistant to coaching.
3 Satisfactory Steady; recovers from setbacks with support.
4 Very Good Self-motivated, coachable, and steady through bad stretches.
5 Excellent Holds standards and honesty through a bad month rather than overselling to save the number.