Review the evidence signals before interviewing. Then use the anchored descriptions—not instinct alone—to choose the score that best matches each answer.
01
Evaluation factor
Hands-on competence
35% weight
Check hands-on work with NFT channels, deep water culture or drip tables: mixing A/B stock tanks, calibrating Bluelab or Hanna EC and pH probes, servicing Dosatron injectors, RO and UV filtration.
Evidence to listen for
Names the equipment, materials, and tolerances they work to
Can describe a job start to finish without hand-waving the hard parts
Holds the tickets, licences, or certifications the work requires, and they are current
Knows what they are not qualified to touch
Five-point scoring guide
1
Poor
Cannot describe the work concretely; lacks required tickets or licences.
2
Needs Improvement
Basic familiarity; needs supervision on routine tasks.
3
Satisfactory
Competent on standard work; slower or unsure on unfamiliar jobs.
4
Very Good
Skilled and independent across the normal range of the role.
5
Excellent
Names crop types, target EC, pH and water temperature ranges, and describes weekly probe calibration plus reservoir turnover and dump-and-fill routines.
02
Evaluation factor
Safety discipline
30% weight
Probe chemical handling of nitric or phosphoric acid and peroxide sanitation, SDS awareness, pesticide applicator licensing, lockout tagout on pumps, and GlobalG.A.P. or FSMA produce safety habits.
Evidence to listen for
Treats procedure as protection rather than paperwork
Can describe a time they stopped work and why
Knows the specific hazards of this trade and the controls for each
Reports near misses instead of hiding them
Five-point scoring guide
1
Poor
Casual about safety; describes shortcuts with pride.
2
Needs Improvement
Follows procedure when watched; cannot name the hazards that matter.
3
Satisfactory
Sound safety habits; less certain on unfamiliar hazards.
4
Very Good
Safety is instinctive; can describe stopping work over a real concern.
5
Excellent
Describes PPE for acid dosing, spill response, correct labelling of stock tanks, and food safety records kept for audit without prompting.
03
Evaluation factor
Fault finding
20% weight
Test diagnosis of pH drift, root rot from pythium, tip burn, clogged emitters, dissolved oxygen crashes and failed climate sensors on Argus, Priva or TrolMaster controllers.
Evidence to listen for
Has a method for narrowing a fault rather than swapping parts
Reads schematics, manuals, or error codes and acts on them
Knows when to escalate rather than guess
Can describe a fault that took real work to find
Five-point scoring guide
1
Poor
Parts-swapper; no diagnostic method.
2
Needs Improvement
Fixes symptoms; cannot explain how they found the cause.
3
Satisfactory
Solid on familiar faults; less structured on new ones.
4
Very Good
Clear systematic method with a real hard-fault story.
5
Excellent
Walks a specific failure from symptom to root cause using logged EC, DO and VPD trends, then names the corrective and preventive fix applied.
04
Evaluation factor
Reliability and conduct
15% weight
Assess coverage of daily crop walks, irrigation logs and shift handovers, plus willingness to work weekends, holidays and respond to overnight alarm callouts on reservoirs or chillers.
Evidence to listen for
Turns up, on time, prepared
Handles shift work, callouts, or travel as the role requires
Documents work so the next person can pick it up
Deals with customers or site staff professionally
Five-point scoring guide
1
Poor
Unreliable attendance; unprofessional on site.
2
Needs Improvement
Inconsistent; documentation is an afterthought.
3
Satisfactory
Dependable; paperwork is adequate.
4
Very Good
Consistently reliable, documents well, professional with customers.
5
Excellent
Cites years of unbroken crop cycles, documented logs handed to growers, and concrete examples of answering after-hours pump or chiller alarms.
Put this rubric to work
Score every candidate against the same standard
Add these weighted factors to Hirevire and let AI evaluate recorded answers against your rubric.
