Check the lists they built, the tools they sourced from, and how many of their leads survived the sales team's filter.
Evidence to listen for Gives numbers: quota, attainment, deal size, client roster Explains the market and buyer they sold to, not just the product Distinguishes what they closed from what the team closed Can describe a deal they lost and whyFive-point scoring guide 1 Poor No numbers; cannot describe what they actually sold or to whom.
2 Needs Improvement Vague attainment; credit for team results is unclear.
3 Satisfactory Real record with some numbers; attribution occasionally fuzzy.
4 Very Good Clear numbers and ownership, including honest losses.
5 Excellent Builds lists whose leads survive sales qualification, and knows their own accepted-lead rate.
Test how they define an ideal customer profile and verify a contact rather than scraping indiscriminately.
Evidence to listen for Has a repeatable approach to qualifying and progressing deals Can walk a real deal from first contact to close Handles objections with questions rather than scripts Knows when to disqualifyFive-point scoring guide 1 Poor No method; pitches at everyone and hopes.
2 Needs Improvement Weak qualification; deals stall with no diagnosis.
3 Satisfactory Workable method; inconsistent on complex or long cycles.
4 Very Good Clear repeatable method; disqualifies early and deliberately.
5 Excellent Researches and verifies against a real ICP, and can explain why they excluded plausible-looking prospects.
Assess data hygiene: deduplication, bounce rates, and respecting suppression and privacy rules.
Evidence to listen for Has clients or talent who came back or referred them Manages a difficult conversation without damaging the relationship Represents the client's interest, not only the commission Builds rapport across seniority levelsFive-point scoring guide 1 Poor Transactional; burns relationships for a close.
2 Needs Improvement Builds rapport but does not sustain relationships.
3 Satisfactory Solid relationships; less tested in conflict.
4 Very Good Repeat business and referrals; handles conflict without damage.
5 Excellent Keeps bounce and duplicate rates low and respects suppression and privacy rules without being policed.
Judge written English in outreach copy and how they report results to the person paying for them.
Evidence to listen for Handles rejection and a bad quarter without unravelling Self-directed on pipeline rather than waiting for leads Coachable on feedback Honest in how they represent the product and themselvesFive-point scoring guide 1 Poor Gives up easily; blames leads, product, or market.
2 Needs Improvement Motivation depends on momentum; resistant to coaching.
3 Satisfactory Steady; recovers from setbacks with support.
4 Very Good Self-motivated, coachable, and steady through bad stretches.
5 Excellent Writes outreach that reads human, and reports honest numbers including the weeks that underperformed.