Interview scorecard template

TikTok Content Creator interview scorecard

Pre-screening scorecard for TikTok Content Creator candidates.

See AI scoring
creative performancecapcutcreator economyshort form videotiktok
Complete evaluation framework

What to assess and how to score it

Review the evidence signals before interviewing. Then use the anchored descriptions—not instinct alone—to choose the score that best matches each answer.

01
Evaluation factor

Body of work

35% weight

Ask for their handle and three posts they made from concept to publish; check view counts, watch-through rate, saves, and whether growth came from one fluke or a repeatable format.

Evidence to listen for

  • Has work that exists publicly and can be checked
  • States what they made versus what they contributed to
  • Can talk about range as well as their signature style
  • Knows how the work was received and by whom

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

Nothing finished or public; describes intentions rather than output.

2
Needs Improvement

Small or unverifiable body of work; unclear personal contribution.

3
Satisfactory

Real output with adequate range; reception described vaguely.

4
Very Good

Substantial verifiable work with clear ownership and range.

5
Excellent

Shows an owned account with named breakout videos, cites retention and save rates, and explains the format that reliably repeated performance.

02
Evaluation factor

Craft and technique

25% weight

Probe hook writing in the first two seconds, on-camera lighting and audio setup, CapCut or Premiere editing, caption pacing, and how they pick trending sounds before saturation.

Evidence to listen for

  • Can discuss technique concretely rather than in terms of feel or vibe
  • Names influences and what they took from each
  • Explains a deliberate choice and the effect it was for
  • Knows their own weak areas and what they do about them

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

No technical vocabulary; cannot discuss choices behind the work.

2
Needs Improvement

Talks in generalities; choices sound accidental.

3
Satisfactory

Solid craft with some ability to explain decisions.

4
Very Good

Articulate about technique and deliberate about effect.

5
Excellent

Names specific hook structures, edits their own cuts and captions, and describes catching a sound or trend early rather than late.

03
Evaluation factor

Reliability and process

25% weight

Test volume and consistency: posts per week sustained, batching and shoot days, content calendar tools, brand deal turnaround, and how they handle FTC disclosure and usage rights.

Evidence to listen for

  • Meets deadlines and briefs, with evidence
  • Handles revisions and direction without ego
  • Describes how they work when the brief is vague or changes late
  • Has repeat clients, bookings, or collaborators

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

Misses commitments; cannot take direction.

2
Needs Improvement

Inconsistent delivery; defensive about revisions.

3
Satisfactory

Reliable on clear briefs; struggles when direction shifts.

4
Very Good

Consistently delivers and adapts; repeat collaborators.

5
Excellent

Sustained a posting cadence for months, batches shoots, hits sponsor deadlines with revisions, and handles paid partnership labels without prompting.

04
Evaluation factor

Presence with an audience

15% weight

Look at how they perform to camera and to the comment section: LIVE sessions, replies driving repeat viewers, community response to a flop or negative pile-on.

Evidence to listen for

  • Comfortable performing or presenting on demand, including cold
  • Reads a room and adjusts
  • Handles a bad night, a difficult client, or a hostile crowd without unravelling
  • Represents the employer well in front of others

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

Cannot perform or present on request; unravels under pressure.

2
Needs Improvement

Rigid delivery; no read of the room.

3
Satisfactory

Competent in familiar settings; less adaptable in new ones.

4
Very Good

Strong presence and adapts to the room.

5
Excellent

Holds attention solo on camera, converts comments into follow-up videos, and de-escalates negative threads without deleting or defensiveness.

Put this rubric to work

Score every candidate against the same standard

Add these weighted factors to Hirevire and let AI evaluate recorded answers against your rubric.

Explore AI Scorecards