Interview scorecard template

Real Estate Agents interview scorecard

Evaluate Real Estate Agents candidates across four weighted areas: track record, method and qualification, relationships and trust, and drive and resilience. Track record leads at 35%, so ask for closed transaction volume over the last 24 months, list-to-sale price ratio, average days on market, and split between listing side and buyer side. Use the rubric to compare role-specific evidence consistently.

See AI scoring
sales business developmentbuyer representationclosing ratiomlsresidential listings
TL;DR
For track record, look for evidence the candidate quotes verified GCI, units closed, and days on market by year, and names the brokerage and price bands worked. For method and qualification, look for evidence the candidate walks through a pricing conversation backed by comparables, and screens buyers on pre-approval, timeline, and financing type before touring. Apply the written 1–5 anchors to every answer, record the evidence behind each rating, and use the factor weights to reach a consistent overall assessment.
Complete evaluation framework

What to assess and how to score it

Review the evidence signals before interviewing. Then use the anchored descriptions—not instinct alone—to choose the score that best matches each answer.

01
Evaluation factor

Track record

35% weight

Ask for closed transaction volume over the last 24 months, list-to-sale price ratio, average days on market, and split between listing side and buyer side deals.

Evidence to listen for

  • Gives numbers: quota, attainment, deal size, client roster
  • Explains the market and buyer they sold to, not just the product
  • Distinguishes what they closed from what the team closed
  • Can describe a deal they lost and why

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

No numbers; cannot describe what they actually sold or to whom.

2
Needs Improvement

Vague attainment; credit for team results is unclear.

3
Satisfactory

Real record with some numbers; attribution occasionally fuzzy.

4
Very Good

Clear numbers and ownership, including honest losses.

5
Excellent

Quotes verified GCI, units closed, and days on market by year, and names the brokerage and price bands worked.

02
Evaluation factor

Method and qualification

25% weight

Probe their listing presentation: CMA build in MLS or RPR, pricing strategy, seller net sheet, and how they qualify buyers with lender pre-approval before showings.

Evidence to listen for

  • Has a repeatable approach to qualifying and progressing deals
  • Can walk a real deal from first contact to close
  • Handles objections with questions rather than scripts
  • Knows when to disqualify

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

No method; pitches at everyone and hopes.

2
Needs Improvement

Weak qualification; deals stall with no diagnosis.

3
Satisfactory

Workable method; inconsistent on complex or long cycles.

4
Very Good

Clear repeatable method; disqualifies early and deliberately.

5
Excellent

Walks through a pricing conversation backed by comparables, and screens buyers on pre-approval, timeline, and financing type before touring.

03
Evaluation factor

Relationships and trust

25% weight

Look for a repeat and referral pipeline: past client database, sphere follow-up cadence, CRM used (Follow Up Boss, kvCORE), and how they handled a deal that fell out of escrow.

Evidence to listen for

  • Has clients or talent who came back or referred them
  • Manages a difficult conversation without damaging the relationship
  • Represents the client's interest, not only the commission
  • Builds rapport across seniority levels

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

Transactional; burns relationships for a close.

2
Needs Improvement

Builds rapport but does not sustain relationships.

3
Satisfactory

Solid relationships; less tested in conflict.

4
Very Good

Repeat business and referrals; handles conflict without damage.

5
Excellent

Shows a maintained database driving measurable referral business, and describes salvaging a contract after inspection or appraisal issues.

04
Evaluation factor

Drive and resilience

15% weight

Test prospecting stamina: weekly hours on open houses, door knocking, expireds and FSBO calls, and how they responded to a quarter with no closings.

Evidence to listen for

  • Handles rejection and a bad quarter without unravelling
  • Self-directed on pipeline rather than waiting for leads
  • Coachable on feedback
  • Honest in how they represent the product and themselves

Five-point scoring guide

1
Poor

Gives up easily; blames leads, product, or market.

2
Needs Improvement

Motivation depends on momentum; resistant to coaching.

3
Satisfactory

Steady; recovers from setbacks with support.

4
Very Good

Self-motivated, coachable, and steady through bad stretches.

5
Excellent

Describes a fixed daily lead generation block with tracked contact counts, and shows income planning through slow seasons.

Evidence-led prompts

Interview questions for a Real Estate Agents

Use these prompts to surface evidence for the weighted factors above and compare candidates against the same role-specific criteria.

  1. 01

    How many transactions did you close in the last twelve months?

  2. 02

    What is your experience in the real estate industry?

  3. 03

    What is your average list-to-sale price ratio?

  4. 04

    Which areas or neighbourhoods do you primarily work in?

  5. 05

    Which property types do you have the most transaction experience with?

See the complete Real Estate Agents question set
Put this rubric to work

Score every candidate against the same standard

Add these weighted factors to Hirevire and let AI evaluate recorded answers against your rubric.

Explore AI Scorecards